|
Replacing A Levels - With What?
For many teachers, students, universities and employers,
the opportunity to replace A levels with a new syllabus cannot come
too soon. This narrow system of assessment deters many students
from choosing further education, and provides a poor assessment
of those that do. The attempt to broaden this system by the introduction
of 'S' Levels has led to overload of exams and further confusion.
The
choice of its replacement has to be one of the most important decisions
a government could take. Any new system must both encourage students
of 16 to continue studying, and arm all students with skills they
need for employment. The new syllabus must promote values which
help bind a community together.
Reinventing
the Wheel
Yet the Government's proposal to design a British 'Baccalaureate'
is expensive, time consuming and completely reinvents the wheel.
The study will cost tens of millions of pounds and means 10 more
years of A levels until the syllabus is launched. All this, when
there already exists a recognized and established baccalaureate
curriculum that could be used as a model and introduced in less
time.
The
International Baccalaureate (IB) provides
the model of a comprehensive and balanced curriculum coupled with
challenging assessment. It has been running for 30 years and is
already recognize by every university in Britain. It is offered
by over 1000 schools world wide and is already in place in 43 UK
institutions. So why is the Government intent on spending tens of
millions of pounds on a ten year programme to rewrite a curriculum?
Labour wants Whitehall to maintain control and is dismissive of
something which is not British, yet schools are crying out for less
government interference.
The
International Baccalaureate
(IB)
The IB focuses on six subjects, three at a higher level and three
at a lower level. This may not seem too different from the present
mishmash of A and S levels. The crucial difference is that for the
IB, students MUST choose a balanced programme. For English speaking
students this would include English, a non-mother tongue language,
maths, science, a choice from a humanities area, and one other choice
such as art or drama. Credit is given for extra curricular activity
such as voluntary work, music and sport. Students also complete
one extended essay, and a programme in thinking skills.
If
this seems a programme only for the elite it is not so. The full
spread of student ability is covered and weaker students may take
a less rigorous programme of certificates. What all students achieve
in the final years of school is a balanced and rigorous preparation
for the working world of the future. An ability to speak a foreign
language, development of thinking skills and a broad understanding
of responsibility to society all contribute to success as a person
and in a job.
Where
the Government needs to focus its intellectual thinking is in relation
to the curriculum for 14-16 year olds and what will happen to students
who leave full time education at 16 . Throwing out GCSEs may be
a cheap solution, but it does not provide an answer to the education
of this vitally important age group and its vocational needs.
With
Britain lagging behind many of its economic rivals, the introduction
of a curriculum based on the IB model would be an educational investment.
It would raise standards and provide a much broader skills base,
meaning not all students would feel obliged to attend university,
as skills requirements for jobs will have already been met.
A
watered down British baccalaureate with no clear philosophical aims,
as presently proposed, would again tinker with the system, which
would remain in Whitehall control and avoid the radical changes
that our education community is calling out for. The IB is a well
tried and tested model and would certainly be greeted by industry
as meeting their needs.
Do
we really want our children to be the guinea pigs of another 'horlicks'
of a Whitehall experiment or would it not be wiser to work from
the model of The International Baccalaureate and its 30 years experience
?
|